Using brokers and advisers
Whether or not you use a broker or adviser depends on what the right fit for your practice is
There are advocates and detractors when it comes to the question of whether or not you should use a broker or adviser to faciliate the sale of your practice, or whether you can do it yourself.
There is also a difference between brokers and advisers - in this article, Keith Underwood of Foulger Underwood explains the role of an adviser in selling your practice, and how they differ from brokers.
Pros
- brokers/advisers can provide you with a good overview of the current market and the trends they are seeing
- they should have a list of potential buyers on their books that they can look at for suitable matches
- they can give you a realistic valuation for your practice
- they can give you some tips for making your practice look more attractive to potential buyers which could translate into a bigger sale price
- they can guide you through the various stages of the process to completion of the sale
- since they act for both parties, they will want to find a good match between the buyer and the seller, and help negotiate a deal that will satisfy both sides
- they may be able to assist if a dispute arises between the buyer and the seller post-sale.
Cons
- using a broker or adviser can feel impersonal
- nobody knows your practice the way you do - so you are best placed to guage whether a potential buyer would be a good fit for your clients. A broker or adviser may not have that knowledge
- the only valuation a broker or adviser is likely to give is based on turnover
- a broker or adviser will take a fee - depending on the broker or adviser, this may be paid by the seller, or the buyer, or split between them.
If you do decide to use a broker or adviser, check that they require potential buyers to sign a confidentiality agreement, and that they only tell a potential buyer who you are with your blessing.