Part 3 of 4
This is the Finance Act 2014 version of this article. It is relevant for candidates sitting the Paper P6 (UK) exam in the period 1 April 2015 to 30 June 2016. Candidates sitting Paper P6 (UK) after 30 June 2016 should refer to the Finance Act 2015 version of this article (to be published in 2016).
So far we have reviewed the definitions of a group relief group and a capital gains group and considered some aspects of group planning.
The remaining parts of this article continue to examine the tax planning issues relating to group relief groups. This part looks at associated companies, consortia and the carry back of losses. Throughout this review of tax planning issues, the term ‘losses’ will be used to represent any/all tax attributes that can be surrendered via group relief.
When determining the upper and lower limits of a particular company, watch out for the length of the accounting period and make sure you are confident of the definition of an associated company. All companies in the group relief group will be associates but so will other companies, including companies where the effective ownership is less than 75%, companies resident overseas; and companies controlled by the same individual(s) even though they are not in a group with the subject company. For example, in the H Ltd group from Part 1 of this article (as set out below), all five companies are associated with each other.
Figure 1: The structure of the H Ltd group of companies
In addition, remember that companies need only be associated at some point in the accounting period and not for the whole of the accounting period. Accordingly, when determining the number of associated companies in relation to a company that has just joined a group, it is necessary to include any companies with which it was associated prior to the purchase (but during the same accounting period).
As a general rule, before starting any calculations in the exam, make sure you have considered all of the possible options. When dealing with group loss planning this means thinking about the possible existence of a consortium. In the group above, D Ltd is not a member of the H Ltd group relief group but that does not necessarily mean that H Ltd cannot surrender losses to D Ltd; it depends on who owns the remainder of D Ltd’s share capital. If companies that each own at least 5%, together own at least 15% (such that they, together with H Ltd, own at least 75%), then D Ltd will be a consortium company. H Ltd would then be able to surrender losses to D Ltd up to a maximum of 60% of D Ltd’s profits.
Once a company has offset trading losses against its total profits of the current accounting period, it can elect to offset any remaining losses against its total profits of the previous 12 months. Unlike group relief, the offset of losses against a company’s own total profits is an all or nothing claim such that, if there are sufficient losses, total profits will be reduced to zero. However, group relief can be used to engineer the carry back of a particular amount of losses in order to offset losses at the highest possible rates of tax as set out in Example 2.
In the year ended 31 March 2015, UL Ltd has a trading loss of £200,000 and no other income or gains. In the previous year its taxable total profits were £235,000. Its upper limit is £375,000 and its lower limit is £75,000. The other members of its group relief group pay corporation tax at the full rate.
UL Ltd has profits of £160,000 (£235,000 – £75,000) taxed at the marginal rate in the year ended 31 March 2014. In order to relieve its losses against these profits, whilst avoiding relieving any profits taxed at the small profits rate, UL Ltd will need to submit the following claims.
The additional corporation tax saved via the operation of this strategy, as opposed to a surrender of all of the losses to group companies, is £400 (£160,000 x (21.25% – 21%)).
In the exam make sure that you think carefully when identifying the number of associated companies and whether or not there is the possibility of a consortium.
Note: Corporation tax issues are considered in two further articles:
Written by a member of the Paper P6 examining team
The comments in this article do not amount to advice on a particular matter and should not be taken as such. No reliance should be placed on the content of this article as the basis of any decision. The author and the ACCA expressly disclaims all liability to any person in respect of any indirect, incidental, consequential or other damages relating to the use of this article.