Double taxation is thus avoided; instead of paying tax of $55, person A pays only $30 globally on the profit of $100. Note how the two countries agree to share the tax revenue, and how the country of residence gives the credit (ie foregoes the tax revenue) of $25 to eliminate the double taxation.
Treaty overrides domestic laws
Section 132 provides that if a DTA has been entered into and it has started to take effect, then, so long as the DTA remains in force, the DTA
‘…shall have effect in relation to tax under this Act notwithstanding anything in any written law.’
Thus, DTAs supersede ‘any written law’ – ie not just tax laws.
This principle has been repeatedly followed and reinforced by the courts; it says that if there is a conflict between domestic law (tax laws, labour laws, etc) and the treaties, the treaties will prevail. Thus, if a treaty provision accords exclusion from tax, any domestic law that imposes tax must give way to treaty provision and surrender its right totax.
A shield, not a sword
Another principle that has been supported in judicial decisions is that a DTA exists to avoid double taxation, not to impose tax, if there is no such tax liability under domestic law. Essentially,the domestic law in the form of the Income Tax Act 1967 is the one and only law to impose a tax liability. A DTA can only act as a shield against double taxation; it cannot wield the taxation sword because it has no authority to do so.
Treaty shopping
This term refers to the practice of searching for (hence the ‘shopping’ element) a suitable country to locate a company in and then placing the said company in that country mainly to take advantage of the treaty benefits accorded to its residents. If such a company is merely a ‘conduit’ structure and does not have sufficient ‘substance’ (ie real and actual commercial activities being carried out by such a company), it may come under scrutiny by the relevant tax authorities and treaty benefits may be denied as a result.
Permanent establishments and business profits
Having dealt with general aspects, let us now examine the very important and pivotal concept of PE in more detail, and consider the significance of a person or enterprise having a PE in a foreign country.
Fixed place of business
PE is a concept in double tax agreements which means ‘a fixed place of business through which the business of an enterpriseis wholly or partly carried on.’
The important elements of a PE are therefore:
- a place of business – there must exist a facility such as premises, facilities or installations and, in some instances, machinery or equipment. It may mean a space which is at its constant disposal
- fixed – the place of business must be fixed, ie it is a distinct place with a degree of permanence. Note, however, that there need not be any formal legal right to use a particular place or space
- through which the business of an enterprise is carried on wholly or partly this means that persons who are dependent on the enterprise, or persons who represent the enterprise, conduct the business of the enterprise through this fixed place of business.
Fixed base: positive list
A DTA usually provides a list of examples of fixed base. The list is indicative, therefore not exhaustive. Each item is to be seen against the background of the general meaning of a ‘fixed base’ discussed above. The positive list usually features the following:
- a place of management
- a branch
- an office
- a factory
- a workshop, and
- a mine, an oil or gas well, a quarry or any other place of extraction of natural resources.
Building site or construction or installation project
On the face of it, a building site, or a construction/installation project constitutes a fixed place of business. However, such a site or project must last a certain minimum period before it can be regarded as a PE. The minimum period prescribed may be six months, nine months or 12 months, depending on what is mutually agreed by the two contracting states. In many of the treaties entered into by Malaysia, six months is the minimum period, although there are some stipulating nine months or even 12 months.
Do bear in mind that the shorter the period stipulated, the easier it is to constitute a PE.
Illustration 5
A German company has secured a project to install 50 wind turbines in Malaysia within a five-month period. It is unlikely to establish a PE through this installation project alone because the Malaysia-Germany treaty stipulates a minimum period of nine months.
Negative list
A treaty will also provide a negative list – ie certain activities of a preparatory or auxiliary character will not constitute a PE. The term PE shall not include the following:
(a) The use of facilities solely for storage, display or delivery of goods/merchandise belonging to the enterprise.
(b) The maintenance of a stock of goods/merchandise solely for storage, display or delivery.
(c) The maintenance of a stock of goods/merchandise solely for processing by another enterprise.
(d) Maintaining a fixed place of business solely for purchasing or collection of information for the enterprise.
(e) Maintaining a fixed place of business solely for the carrying out any other activity of preparatory or auxiliary character.
(f) Maintaining a fixed place of business solely for any combination of activities mentioned in (a) to (e), provided that the overall activity resulting from such combination is preparatory or auxiliary in character.
This means that if all an enterprise does in the other country is purchase, store, deliver, or collect information, or any combination of these activities, the enterprise is deemed to have carried out activities that are merely preparatory or auxiliary in character. The enterprise will not establish a PE purely by carrying out such activities.
Agency PE
Where an enterprise has, in the other country, a person:
- who regularly acts on its behalf, and
- who is vested with authority to conclude contracts in the name of the enterprise, and
- who habitually exercises suchauthority, the enterprise is deemed to have a PE in the other country.
Such a person may be an employee or a dependent agent– ie he is not an independent agent acting in the ordinary course of his business.
Illustration 6
A Malaysian export company has a representative based in Singapore who would regularly take instructions from Malaysia, reports to Malaysia, and who enters into sales contracts on behalf of the Malaysian company. The representative renders these services exclusively to the Malaysian company and is remunerated by the Malaysian company.
The Malaysian company is deemed to have a PE in Singapore because of the presence of the representative in Singapore who regularly transacts on behalf of the Malaysian company.
It follows, therefore, that an enterprise shall not be deemed to have a PE merely because the enterprise carries on business in the other country through a broker, general commission agent or any other independent agent acting in the ordinary course of their business.
Illustration 7
A Singapore investment-dealing company regularly buys and sell shares on the Bursa Malaysia. All the transactions are carried out by a stockbroker operating in Kuala Lumpur based on instructions received from the Singapore company. The stockbroker is an independent agent: his business is to trade shares on the Bursa Malaysia on clients’ instructions.
In this case, the Singapore company does not have a PE in Malaysia purely by virtue of the share transactions on the Bursa Malaysia because the transactions were executed by an independent agent acting in the ordinary course of his business of stockbroking.
Significance of having a PE: business profits attributable to a PE
If there is no PE, the enterprise from one country (Country A) will not be subject to tax in the other country (Country B). On the other hand, once a PE is established in Country B, the enterprise from Country A becomes taxable in the Country B, but only on so much of income as is attributable to the PE in CountryB.
This is stated in paragraph 1 of Article 7 on business profits, dissected as follows:
‘The profits of an enterprise of a contracting state (Country A) shall be taxable only in that state (Country A) unless the enterprise carries on business in the other contracting state (Country B) through a PE situated therein (Country B). If the enterprise carries on business as aforesaid, the profits of the enterprise may be taxed in the other state (Country B) but only so much of them as is attributable to that PE.’
The illustration below serves to explain what is meant by the above paragraph.
Illustration 8
A German company secured a contract to supply and install 500 windturbines off the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia. The installation is expected to take up to 24months. The contract comprises the supply of the 500 wind turbines (constructed and fabricated in Germany) at a cost of RM500m and installation cost of RM200m.
The German company, in constructing and fabricating the wind turbines in Germany and sold to Malaysia, is said to be carrying its business activity of constructing and fabricating the wind turbines in Germany. When it sells the wind turbines to Malaysia, it is said to be doing business with Malaysia.No part of that income is attributable to its activities in Malaysia.
When installing the wind turbines for 24 months in Malaysia, the German company clearly has a fixed base through which it carries out its business activity of installing the wind turbines. Therefore, the income pertaining to the installation project of RM200m will in all likelihood be attributable to the PE in Malaysia as the activity is wholly carried out in Malaysia.
The German company will therefore be subject to tax in Malaysia in respect of the income it derives from the installation project in Malaysia for the duration of the project.
If the income thus subject to tax in Malaysia is also subject to tax in Germany – as is likely the case – then Germany, as the country of residence, will provide bilateral tax relief to alleviate the double taxation thus arisen.
Conclusion
It is important to have a working knowledge of double tax agreements when dealing with cross-border transactions. When the need arises to seek guidance from an agreement, first determine which DTA is applicable and then examine the relevant clauses of that particular DTA. When in doubt as to what a phrase or term means, it is always helpful to refer to the very informative commentaries on the OECD model convention.
Written by a member of the ATX-MYS examining team