It should be noted that in alternative (iv), where Ace Sdn Bhd makes up its first set of accounts to 31 March 2022, the basis period for YA 2022 will be 1 December 2020 (date of commencement of business) to 31 March 2022 – a period of 16 months. There will be no basis periods for the YAs 2020 and 2021.
Implication: tax estimates
Closely connected to the issue of commencement of operations is the issue of the furnishing of the first estimate of tax.
Using illustration 2, if Ace Sdn Bhd has a paid up ordinary share capital exceeding RM2.5m, it will have to furnish its first estimate of tax within three months of the commencement of its operations – ie by 28 February 2021. This compliance requirement is relevant to alternatives (iii) and (iv) because the first basis period is not less than six months [s107C(4)].
[Note: Where a company with a paid up ordinary share capital exceeding RM2.5m commences business operations in a YA where the basis period for that YA is less than six months, the company is exempt from the requirement to furnish an estimate of tax payable for that particular YA].
If Ace Sdn Bhd has a paid up ordinary share capital of less than RM2.5m at the commencement of its operations then it will be a small-and-medium enterprise (SME), as defined. As a SME, a moratorium will apply such that Ace Sdn Bhd, being a company incorporated and resident in Malaysia, will not be required to furnish an estimate of tax for that YA and the immediately following YA. This is the case in alternative (i) – ie Ace Sdn Bhd will not be required to furnish estimates of tax for YA 2020 and YA 2021.
Where a SME company has no basis period for the YA in which it commences its operations, it will not be required to furnish estimates of tax for the two immediately following YAs [s107C(4A)(a)]. This is the case in alternatives (ii) and (iii), where Ace Sdn Bhd has no basis period for YA 2020 (the YA in which it commences operations), it will not be required to furnish estimates of tax for YA 2020, and the two immediately following YAs of YA 2021 and YA 2022.
Lastly, where a SME company has no basis period in the YA it commences and no basis period for the immediately following YA, it will not be required to furnish estimates of tax for the YA in which it commenced operations and the two immediately following YAs [s107C(4A)(c)]. Hence, in alternative (iv), where Ace Sdn Bhd has no basis period for the YA in which it commenced and also has no basis period for the immediately following YA, it will similarly not be required to furnish estimate of tax for YA 2020 and the two immediately following YAs of YA 2021 and YA 2022.
Commencement of operations of a company in a group, etc [s21A(5)]
Where a company commences operations and:
- is required under any law to make up its accounts to a specified date, or
- being a member of a group of companies, makes up its accounts to a date to be coterminous with the rest of the group,
the period covered by the accounts – ie from the date of commencement of operations to the end of the accounting period, shall constitute the basis period of the first YA.
Illustration 3
Alpha Sdn Bhd is a new company incorporated on 1 August 2020. It is a member of the Beta group of companies which all make up their accounts to 31 December annually. Alpha Sdn Bhd commenced operations on 1 October 2020 and makes up its first set of accounts to 31 December 2021 to be coterminous with the group. Thereafter, Alpha closes its accounts annually to 31 December, in line with the group.
Alpha’s first YA is YA 2021 with the basis period covering 1 October 2020 to 31 December 2021.
Change of accounting date [s21A(3)]
Where an existing company, LLP, trust body or co-operative society has made up its accounts for a period of 12 months ending on a day in the basis year, and then it fails to make up its subsequent accounts to the corresponding day in the following year, there is said to be a change of the accounting date.
There could be many commercial reasons for such a change including the need to be co-terminus with the new holding company or with the group or the adoption of a 52-week financial year.
Whatever the reason may be, such a change of accounting date will trigger the need for a direction of basis periods by the DGIR pursuant to section 21A(3). Public Ruling 8 of 2014 [still current and applicable] provides guidance on how the DGIR will direct such basis periods.
The illustration below demonstrates the terms which will be used in this article. However, it should be noted that these are not technical terms.
Illustration 4
XYZ Sdn Bhd made up its accounts annually to 31 March. In 2021, it decided to change its accounting date to 30 September. The terms used and their respective periods are:
- the last normal accounts – 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2020
- the last normal YA – YA 2020
- first set of new accounts – 1 April 2020 to 30 September 2021
- failure year – YA 2021 (the year in which the company fails to make up its accounts to the normal accounting date of 31 March)
- following year – 2022
- the third year – 2023
The underlying principles [see paragraph 5.2 of Public Ruling 8 of 2014, Example 8 and Example 9] adopted when the DGIR directs are:
- there shall be no missing YA – ie no YA should be left out
- there shall not be two or more sets of accounts closed in the same YA
- where an accounting period must be divided between two YAs and there is an uneven division of the basis periods between the two YAs, any fraction of a month should be treated as falling into the first period (refer to illustration 7, later in the article).
How the DGIR will direct may be better explained in this table.